Skip to main content

Obsessive Compulsive Inventory - Revised (OCI-R) Research Statistics

Assessment Information
  • Sample Adequacy: Preliminary dataset. Interpret norms cautiously.
  • Research Status: PRELIMINARY NORMATIVE DATASET
  • Items: 18
  • Dimensions: 6
  • Dataset Maturity: The current dataset achieved a maturity score of 35/100 and is classified as PRELIMINARY.

Table 1
Normative Dataset Overview
Descriptive characteristics of the current normative sample.
Participants 19
Countries Represented 8
Dataset Maturity 35/100 — PreliminaryDataset
Research Status PRELIMINARY NORMATIVE DATASET
Sample Adequacy Preliminary dataset. Interpret norms cautiously.
Data Collection Period May 24, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026
The current normative dataset consists of 19 participants collected from 8 countries.
Table 2
Score Statistics
Measures of central tendency and variability.
Mean Score 40.53%
Median Score 35
Standard Deviation 18.61
Variance 346.37
Standard Error (SEM) 4.27
Reliability (α) 0.828
Items 18
Dimensions 6
The sample demonstrated a mean score of 40.53% (Mdn = 35, SD = 18.61).
Table 3
Distribution Characteristics
Distribution shape and score dispersion indicators.
Observed Score Range 62
Maximum Observed Score 76%
Minimum Observed Score 14%
95% Confidence Interval 32.16– 48.89
Skewness 0.61
Kurtosis -0.78
Observed skewness (0.61) and kurtosis (-0.78) provide indicators of distribution quality and normality.
Global Participation Chart Participants US 6 #1 NL 5 #2 VN 2 #3 IN 2 #4 DZ 1 #5 EG 1 #6 IL 1 #7 CA 1 #8
Global Participation Interpretation

The current dataset includes responses from 8countries . The largest contribution currently comes from US which represents approximately 31.6% of all participants. International participation enhances sample diversity and improves the generalizability of normative findings across geographic regions.

Normative Percentile Distribution

Population Median 10th Percentile 19 Population Median 25th Percentile 25 Population Median 50th Percentile 35 Population Median 75th Percentile 44 Population Median 90th Percentile 65
Normative Interpretation

The current normative dataset indicates that approximately 10% of participants scored below 19%, while 90% scored above this level. The median score was 35%, meaning that half of participants scored below this value and half scored above it. Scores of 44% or greater were achieved by approximately the highest 25% of participants, whereas scores of 65% or greater were achieved by approximately the highest 10% of participants. These percentile values provide preliminary normative benchmarks that can be used to contextualize individual assessment results relative to the current community sample.

Distribution Histogram

10-19 2 20-29 4 30-39 5 40-49 3 60-69 3 70-79 2
Distribution Interpretation

This histogram displays the distribution of participant scores across the assessment. A balanced bell-shaped pattern generally indicates good score dispersion and stronger normative utility, whereas highly skewed distributions may indicate floor effects, ceiling effects, or sample bias.

Distribution Quality

The score distribution demonstrated a skewness of 0.61 and a kurtosis of -0.78.

The score distribution appears reasonably balanced and does not currently suggest substantial departures from normality.

Reliability Analysis

0.828 Poor Acceptable Good Excellent

GOOD RELIABILITY

The assessment demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.828), suggesting that the assessment items measure a relatively coherent psychological construct.

Item–Total Correlations

Insufficient Sample Size

Item–total correlations are not currently reported because the assessment has fewer than 100 participant responses. Psychometric item analysis requires a larger sample to produce stable and interpretable estimates.

Current Participants: 19
Minimum Recommended: 100

Dimension Norms

Dimension Profile Mean SD 50% Obsessions and Intrusive Thoughts 65% 25.3 Ordering 48.6% 34 Hoarding 42.2% 30.7 Checking 35.4% 25.2 Counting 30.3% 30.6 Washing and Contamination 21.9% 27.3
Dimension Interpretation

The highest scoring dimension in the current sample was Obsessions and Intrusive Thoughts (65%). The lowest scoring dimension was Washing and Contamination (21.9%). Dimensions located above the 50% reference line represent characteristics that were more strongly endorsed within the current participant sample. Standard deviations indicate the degree of variability observed across participant responses.

Research Interpretation

This psychometric dataset currently includes 19 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation. The observed mean score was 40.53 with a standard deviation of 18.61, indicating moderate score variability within the sampled population. Internal consistency reliability analysis demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.828). Observed skewness (0.61) and kurtosis (-0.78) were examined as indicators of distribution quality. The score distribution appeared reasonably balanced and did not suggest substantial departures from normality.

Ethical & Research Notice

All responses included in this dataset are collected anonymously through voluntary participation. No personally identifying information is stored. Results are intended exclusively for educational, psychometric, research, and self-reflective purposes and should not be used as clinical diagnoses. Trait Profiler continuously monitors response quality, distribution stability, and internal consistency to support ethical psychometric reporting.

Dataset Export

Download CSV Dataset

Research Citation

Obsessive Compulsive Inventory - Revised (OCI-R). Trait Profiler Interactive Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://traitprofiler.com/oci-r/statistics/

License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)